基于信息量与灾害熵的泥石流危险性评价对比研究——以成兰铁路松潘段为例
作者:
作者单位:

1.重庆交通大学河海学院,重庆 400000 ; 2.重庆交通大学山区公路水运交通地质减灾重庆市高校重点实验室,重庆 400000

作者简介:

雷青青(1997—),女,硕士研究生。主要从事地质灾害防治研究。E-mail:2293793496@qq.com

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

P642.23

基金项目:

第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究任务项目(2019QZKK0902);重庆市研究生联合培养基地建设项目(JDL-HPYJD2018001)资助


A Comparative Study on Debris Flow Hazard Assessment Based onInformation Volume and Disaster Entropy: a Case Study of SongpanSection of Chengdu Lanzhou Railway
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of River and Ocean Engineering ,Chongqing Jiaotong University,Chongqing 400000 ,China ; 2.Key Labora⁃tory of Geological Disaster Reduction of Highway and Water Transportation in Mountainous Areas Chongqing JiaotongUniversity,Chongqing 400000 ,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以成兰铁路松潘段为研究区域,根据野外调查分析、研究区基本环境地质条件,选取9 项影响因子:高程、坡度、降雨量、岩性、地震烈度、NDVI(归一化植被指数)、距离断裂距离、HI(物源参照值)以及流域形状系数,分析泥石流的分布特征。基于GIS 技术,通过信息量和灾害熵两种不同的模型,对各评价指标图层进行分类计算,并进行泥石流危险性评价。结果:在信息量模型中,研究区内危险中度及以上占总面积的87%;泥石流沟内危险中度及以上占沟总面积的65%,共31 条。灾害熵模型中,研究区内中危及以上危险区占总面积的81%;泥石流沟内中危区及以上危险区占沟总面积的80%,共38 条。与灾害的实际分布相比,灾害熵模型给出了更接近实际的结果。

    Abstract:

    Focusing on the Songpan section of the Chengdu-Lanzhou Railway as the study area, thestudy analyzed the distribution characteristics of debris flow based on field investigation and the re-gion's basic environmental geological conditions. Nine influencing factors were considered, includingelevation, slope, rainfall, lithology, seismic intensity, normalized difference vegetation index (ND-VI), distance from faults, source material reference value (HI), and watershed shape coefficient. Us-ing GIS technology, two different models-information volume and disaster entropy-were applied toclassify and calculate each assessment index layer, and the debris flow hazards were assessed. Results showed that, according to the information volume model, 87% of the total area in the study area wasclassified as moderate hazard or above, with 65% of the total area within the debris flow ditches classi-fied as moderate or higher hazard, covering 31 ditches. In the disaster entropy model, areas with mod-erate or higher hazard levels accounted for 81% of the total study area, and 80% of the total area with-in the debris flow ditches were classified as moderate or higher hazard, covering a total of 38 ditches.Compared to the actual distribution of hazards, the disaster entropy model provided results that werecloser to reality.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

雷青青,向灵芝,罗亮,张济燕.基于信息量与灾害熵的泥石流危险性评价对比研究——以成兰铁路松潘段为例[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2024,44(4):921-932

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-07
  • 最后修改日期:2023-04-24
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:2024-09-11
  • 出版日期: